8 HOURS DELIVERY: PLAGIARISM FREE AND QUALITY WORK GUARANTEED.

Nature, or the Nature World, has been the subject of artist and authors for cent

Nature, or the Nature World, has been the subject of artist and authors for centuries. Nature is sometimes the backdrop for the action; sometimes it is a benevolent healing place as in Romantism; and other times it is a dark, foreboding evil presences as Gothic art and literature. For this essay, choose one of the humanities and discus how Nature, The Natural World, or Nature vs. Artificial is depicted and what this tells us about our relationhip with Nature.
Start with how you think about the world in which we all live. Are humans part of the natural world, or do we have dominion over it? Which is “stronger”: Human Nature or our intelligence? Is Nature a calming, peaceful place or one of mystery and danger?
Different cultures at different times have had different relationships with nature. The Humanities (art, literature, music, design) are were cultures explore this relationship. For example, the fairy tale Hansel & Grettle is a cautionary tale about the dangers of going into the woods alone. Frankenstein by Mary Shelly is a cautionary tale about what happens when humans “play G-d” and try to control nature.
So, choose a work of art, a story, a movie, a song, that says something about people and nature. Then, write an essay, after listening to a conversation (i.e. doing some reading about it), on what that work says about Nature.

Requirements Assignment Criteria for the Paper 1. Identify any existing quality

Requirements Assignment Criteria for the Paper 1. Identify any existing quality concern or an existing patient safety issue and provide the rationale for choosing this issue. 2. Explain the background and scope of the problem. 3. Analyze the issue based on the appropriate quality philosophy. 4. Identify the regulatory guidelines, internal and/or external benchmarks, or evidence-based practice standards surrounding the issue—explain what that expectation is and why. 5. Use the appropriate quality improvement tools to improve the quality outcome. 6. Describe how you could or will get involved in this initiative to make a difference and move it forward to enactment. 7. Summarize the content in concluding statements. 8. The body of the scholarly paper is to be 3–5 pages in length, excluding title and reference pages. 9. Grammar, spelling, punctuation, references, and citations are consistent with formal academic writing and APA format as expressed in the current edition. 10. Include a minimum of four references published within the past 5 years, not including your textbook. References may include scholarly websites of organizations or government agencies and must be presented using APA current edition format for electronic media. Preparing the Paper Category Points % Description Introduction and quality concern 25 11% Identify a quality issue/patient safety issue and provide a rationale. Background and scope of the problem 20 9% Analyze the problem from a literature review and a practical point of view. Goals of improvement 20 9% Identify three goals to improve the problem. Quality philosophy application 35 15% Using a quality model, analyze the patient safety concern and the intervention to bridge the gaps. Identification of the regulatory guidelines and internal/external benchmarks or EBP standards for this issue 40 17% Discuss all related factors to this problem and explain what the expectation is and why. Quality process tool and improvement recommendation 40 17% Apply appropriate quality improvement tools to improve the quality outcome; provide illustrations for all tools used (flowchart, gap analysis, root cause analysis, etc.). Choose at least two tools for implementation. Conclusion 15 7% Provide summary and concluding statements. APA style 10 4% Text, title page, and reference page(s) are completely consistent with APA current edition format. Scholarly references 15 7% Paper is 3–5 pages in length, excluding the cover and reference pages. References include a minimum of 4 scholarly references, excluding the course text. Grammar and spelling 10 4% Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work. Total 230 100% A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.

Requirements Assignment Criteria for the Paper 1. Identify any existing quality

Requirements Assignment Criteria for the Paper 1. Identify any existing quality concern or an existing patient safety issue and provide the rationale for choosing this issue. 2. Explain the background and scope of the problem. 3. Analyze the issue based on the appropriate quality philosophy. 4. Identify the regulatory guidelines, internal and/or external benchmarks, or evidence-based practice standards surrounding the issue—explain what that expectation is and why. 5. Use the appropriate quality improvement tools to improve the quality outcome. 6. Describe how you could or will get involved in this initiative to make a difference and move it forward to enactment. 7. Summarize the content in concluding statements. 8. The body of the scholarly paper is to be 3–5 pages in length, excluding title and reference pages. 9. Grammar, spelling, punctuation, references, and citations are consistent with formal academic writing and APA format as expressed in the current edition. 10. Include a minimum of four references published within the past 5 years, not including your textbook. References may include scholarly websites of organizations or government agencies and must be presented using APA current edition format for electronic media. Preparing the Paper Category Points % Description Introduction and quality concern 25 11% Identify a quality issue/patient safety issue and provide a rationale. Background and scope of the problem 20 9% Analyze the problem from a literature review and a practical point of view. Goals of improvement 20 9% Identify three goals to improve the problem. Quality philosophy application 35 15% Using a quality model, analyze the patient safety concern and the intervention to bridge the gaps. Identification of the regulatory guidelines and internal/external benchmarks or EBP standards for this issue 40 17% Discuss all related factors to this problem and explain what the expectation is and why. Quality process tool and improvement recommendation 40 17% Apply appropriate quality improvement tools to improve the quality outcome; provide illustrations for all tools used (flowchart, gap analysis, root cause analysis, etc.). Choose at least two tools for implementation. Conclusion 15 7% Provide summary and concluding statements. APA style 10 4% Text, title page, and reference page(s) are completely consistent with APA current edition format. Scholarly references 15 7% Paper is 3–5 pages in length, excluding the cover and reference pages. References include a minimum of 4 scholarly references, excluding the course text. Grammar and spelling 10 4% Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work. Total 230 100% A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.