OVERVIEW In this assignment, you will address a public health issue in the prior

In this assignment, you will address a public health issue in the priority population identified in
your previous Cultural Health Barriers-Risks Paper Assignment, offering culturally appropriate
content and methods as a solution to mitigate identified health barriers and risks. The solution
must be practical and acceptable to the population. Use what you’ve learned in this course to
inform this. The student will research the condition and the contributing cultural determinants
and then develop a program proposal to address it. The proposal must include goals, SMART
objectives, and a preliminary budget to implement the program. The budget should be presented
in a tabular format identifying expected start-up expenses and identifying potential funding
sources. The good news is that the Liberty Health Mission Board recognizes your dedication to
excellence and has offered $10,000 to each project to help the initiatives! It isn’t much, but it is a
start. (Remember the parable of the talents.) Invest wisely and leverage your investment to
advance your agenda. A good program evaluation strategy is always a part of funding requests. It
will provide the core to the project report generated to maintain accountability to the donor
organizations—so, include one. This assignment will be an actual test of the student’s ability to
demonstrate competence on all course outcomes. The grade will be determined by a combination
of the written and oral components.
 The final solution will be presented as a 12–15-slide PowerPoint presentation with
presentation notes. Each notes section at the bottom of each slide must be 250–350 words
in length. Assume that you will be presenting the PowerPoint to your potential partners.
Create an original video presentation of this project. Record a video of you presenting the
PowerPoint. The video must be 10-15 minutes.

For this discussion, you will analyze a case study in public health from the tex

For this discussion, you will analyze a case study in public health from the textbook Master of Public Health Competencies: A Case Study Approach edited by Santella. Please review the following case study from this text:
● Chapter 10: Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program Priority Setting and Resource Management Process.
This case study was based on real public health initiatives. Therefore, your engagement in this discussion will help you hone workforce-related skills for public health practice.
For your initial/main post, please address all of the following questions:
● Basic Principles and Tools of Public Health Finance:
○ If you were the chair of the SAP Committee or chair of the Planning Council, what steps would you take to ensure all members (ranging from consumers without formal education to physicians and other providers) understand the basic budget principles and resource allocation/management processes?
○ Within the informational resources or training provided to the membership, what concepts would you cover?
■ Note: Outline at least two (2) basic principles of financial and resources management. For each principle, explain at least one (1) basic tool that could be used for financial and resources management in public health.
■ Suggested format:
● Basic Principle 1: Details of corresponding tool 1.
● Basic Principle 2: Details of corresponding tool 2.
● Strategic Financial and Resources Management:
○ What strengths and weaknesses can you identify for the budget and resource allocation/management process done by the Nassau–Suffolk Ryan White Planning Council?
○ What strategic management tools would you use to analyze this situation? Please explain.
○ How would you address weaknesses through the effective/efficient management of resources? Provide an example based on the case study.
● Negotiating and Mediating Conflicts:
○ How would you manage the conflicts of interest that arise when providers and consumers try to influence a vote on allocations to meet their own needs? Explain how you would mediate these differing goals to arrive at a common conclusion.
○ In McCarthy and Hay’s (2015) Advanced Negotiation Techniques, four mantras of negotiation were detailed. How would you apply these mantras to managing conflicts during negotiations in public health? Which mantra is most important to addressing the conflict of differing goals (in your opinion), and how would this mantra help negotiations arrive at a common conclusion? To be clear, McCarthy and Hay’s (2015) negotiation mantras were:
■ Negotiation Mantra 1: Negotiation Is Perceptual, Not Factual
■ Negotiation Mantra 2: Clear Yourself of Emotion and Be Pragmatic
■ Negotiation Mantra 3: Negotiation Is Cooperative, Not Competitive
■ Negotiation Mantra 4: Rapport First, Understanding Second
In all posts, please make certain to include in-text citations and a reference list.
2 pages, APA STYLE